Collaborative Rankings
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we introduce a new ranking algorithm, called Collaborative Judgement (CJ), that takes into account peer opinions of agents and/or humans on objects (e.g. products, exams, papers) as well as peer judgements over those opinions. The combination of these two types of information has not been studied in previous work in order to produce object rankings. Here we apply Collaborative Judgement to the use case of scientific paper assessment and we validate it over simulated data. The results show that the rankings produced by our algorithm improve current scientific paper ranking practice, which is based on averages of opinions weighted by their reviewers’ self-assessments. Address for correspondence: Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain ∗Supported by an Industrial PhD scholarship from the Generalitat de Catalunya. 1002 Ewa Andrejczuk, Juan Antonio Rodriguez-Aguilar, Carles Sierra / Collaborative Rankings
منابع مشابه
Sketching Algorithms for Approximating Rank Correlations in Collaborative Filtering Systems
Collaborative filtering (CF) shares information between users to provide each with recommendations. Previous work suggests using sketching techniques to handle massive data sets in CF systems, but only allows testing whether users have a high proportion of items they have both ranked. We show how to determine the correlation between the rankings of two users, using concise “sketches” of the ran...
متن کاملRecommendation Using Textual Opinions
Many web sites collect reviews of products and services and use them provide rankings of their quality. However, such rankings are not personalized. We investigate how the information in the reviews written by a particular user can be used to personalize the ranking she is shown. We propose a new technique, topic profile collaborative filtering, where we build user profiles from users’ review t...
متن کاملEstimating Probabilities in Recommendation Systems
Modeling ranked data is an essential component in a number of important applications including recommendation systems and websearch. In many cases, judges omit preference among unobserved items and between unobserved and observed items. This case of analyzing incomplete rankings is very important from a practical perspective and yet has not been fully studied due to considerable computational d...
متن کاملCollaborative Judgement
In this paper we introduce a new ranking algorithm, called Collaborative Judgement (CJ), that takes into account peer opinions of agents and/or humans on objects (e.g. products, exams, papers) as well as peer judgements over those opinions. The combination of these two types of information has not been studied in previous work in order to produce object rankings. We apply CJ to the use case of ...
متن کاملA Lower-Bound on the Number of Rankings Required in Recommender Systems Using Collaborative Filtering
We consider the situation where users rank items from a given set, and each user ranks only a (small) subset of all items. We assume that users can be classified into C classes, and users in a given class c have the same ranking for all items. For this situation we are interested in the following question. As a function of the number of users N in a given class c and the numbers of items IN to ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Fundam. Inform.
دوره 158 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2018